Duty to Reinstate a Mentally Disabled Employee
Duty to Reinstate a Mentally DIsabled Employee
The case of Josephs v. Pacific Bell deals with
the duty of the employer to reinstate an employee with a mental
disability, despite the potential harm the employee may cause.
The interesting facts in this case are as follows:
- PacBell hired Joshua Josephs as a service technician after
Josephs lied on his application and answered that he had never been
convicted for a misdemeanor.
- PacBell conducted a permissible background check and discovered
that Josephs had been tried for attempted murder (but found guilty
by reason of insanity) and had been convicted of a misdemeanor
battery on a police officer. PacBell also learned that Josephs had
spent 2.5 years in a CA mental hospital and 6 months in a
board-and-care mental health facility.
- Upon learning the above information about Josephs, PacBell
terminated Josephs' employment for lying on his employment
application.
- Josephs sued PacBell for refusing to reinstate him because
PacBell regarded him as mentally disabled.
Arguments made by Both Sides
- PacBell argued that Josephs' job required customer contact and
Josephs' "emotional dysfunction" might result in an attack on a
customer.
- When Josephs noted that PacBell had reinstated another employee
who had failed to report a conviction, PacBell replied that
Josephs' situation was different because he had spend time in a
mental ward.
Conclusion
- The Court affirmed the jury's verdict that the denial of
reinstatement was based on the perception that Josephs was mentally
ill. The Court found sufficient evidence that Josephs was perceived
as having a mental impairment "substantially limited" him in the
"major life activity" of working.
- If you believe that your employer is refusing to reinstate you
because of a perceived mental disability, call this office for a
consultation.
|